Committee on Freshman Guidance, 1957

Well, even though we’ve gone back to on-line classes it seems there was no stopping O Week this year. They are back and bubbling over with enthusiasm, sending me into hiding until it’s over. I recently came across this short report produced by a student-faculty committee that studied how best to manage freshman orientation. It was written just at the moment the college system was about to come into existence. It’s dated February, 1957 and the move into the colleges happened that March. The genesis of the college system was not welcomed by everyone, and in fact there was pretty stout opposition from some students. It took several years for loyalty to one’s class year to be replaced by loyalty to the colleges and this report reads more or less as though the dominant social groups would continue to be the classes. (And note that it’s signed by Burt McMurtry, who served on the committee that recommended the switch to the college system and provided the original design.) Which shows us nothing, I suppose, except that it’s very hard to anticipate precisely how change will play out.

The other thing that jumps out of this document is the repeated insistence that there be no hazing and that participation be absolutely voluntary. Hazing of freshmen by sophomores had been a feature of student life at the Institute from the beginning but the 1956 deaths of two students who got trapped in the Campanile brought great resolve to the effort to do away with it. It’s my sense that it did largely disappear, but only gradually.

 

Bonus: The new field turf looks really nice!

The old stuff awaits disposal:

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Committee on Freshman Guidance, 1957

  1. Galloway Hudson (Wiess '60) says:

    This one really hits home. I was in the only class (1960) that suffered the full impact of Freshman Guidance but was not allowed to subject the next class to it. Probably just as well, but I can tell you that hazing did not go away “gradually”. We did not haze the Class of 1961, although I do remember that we had a Slime Parade, which of course was voluntary. I suppose the freshmen that year wore their beanies, but I don’t remember for sure that they did. Perhaps someone from the Class of 1961 will comment.

  2. George Webb says:

    The author of the report was the great Burt McMurtry!

    • Melissa, George, and all.
      With all that the ‘Murts’ did for the “Institute/University”, they take on a mystical qualtiy for those who follow after.
      As a classmate of those two, I want to also praise and honor them as they were: They were good, honest, moral kids. They were –DD probablly still is, as I think she is still living– happy teenagers becoming praiseworthy adults.
      They were friendly, funloving, normal.
      I’m privileged to have known them as friends.
      [Hello, DD, if you’re still around.]f
      gene pratt

  3. Grungy says:

    With the sand and infill, those rolls weigh 12,000 pounds each.

  4. We stopped by and (with permission from Athletics Facilities) loaded up a bunch of it for a project we’re doing. Reading RHC pays off.

  5. grungy1973 says:

    The remaining rolls of old AstroTurf were hauled off between the UH football game and The MOB’s stadium rehearsal on Thursday. I have a limited supply of 4″ square samples of the new stuff. Color choices are green, blue, or white.

Leave a Reply to George Webb Cancel reply